Ammo library
Framing It as a Consent Question
Severity 2FramingStep 2Step 3Step 6Step 7
Talks about consent to exploitation, no one would consent to being exploited, so the frame is wrong and philosophical.
The give pair
Gives ammo
Animals can't consent to being exploited, that's the problem.
Gives nothing
Do you agree humans should live without exploiting other animals?
The round they fire back
Debates consent hypotheticals instead of personal accountability for exploitation.
How to fix it
Never talk about consent. No one would consent to being exploited, ever. Stay on respect vs exploitation and victim position.
Coaching notes
- Consent framing is philosophical and unnecessary, exploitation is wrong regardless.
Related lessons
- Exploitation = purposes only The frame
- Never consent framing Exploitation, not suffering