Ammo library
Defining Exploitation Wrong
Severity 3FramingStep 1Step 4
Defines exploitation with benefit, will, gain, pleasure, or interests framing, instead of the act of using someone for your purposes or as a means to an end.
The give pair
Gives ammo
Exploitation is using animals against their will and interests for your benefit and pleasure.
Gives nothing
Exploitation is the act of using someone for your purposes or as a means to an end.
The round they fire back
Debates semantics, will, benefit, pleasure, or whether exploitation serves the animal's interests, instead of the simple purposes frame.
How to fix it
Exploitation is the act of using someone for your purposes or as a means to an end. Only use purposes/means framing.
Coaching notes
- Purposes framing is binary and hard to dodge. Wrong framings invite debate and escape routes:
- Benefit, lets them argue it helps the animal or society (tradeoff, not moral wrong), or that it's not for their benefit at all, addiction, habit, knowing meat causes cancer, guilt while eating.
- Will, opens consent debates; they'll claim animals have no will, would consent, or can't consent, or point to broken animals (horses 'choosing' to be ridden) as if exploitation reflects their will.
- Gain / pleasure, lets them say it's not for pleasure (nutrition, tradition, habit) and dodge accountability.
- Interests, if you say 'against their interests,' they justify exploitation whenever they deem it in the animal's best interest (saved from the wild, humane death, farming gives them life).
Related lessons
- Exploitation = purposes only The frame