Curriculum catalog

Open with: Hello, how do you feel about humans exploiting other animals? Correct first question. Qualifies empathy and reachability. Get a feeling before moving on. Define using someone for your purposes. Deflection on feeling = strike. Three strikes, disengage.

Difficulty:

reachable

Steps:

1

Flaws:

sufferingNotExploitation, howNotWhy, feelingMissedStep1, includesSelfWithExploiters

Get agreement that humans should respect other animals. Say agree, not believe, avoids religion tangents.

Difficulty:

reachable

Steps:

2

Flaws:

debating

Ask exploitation vs respect, not consumption, diet, or consumer choices. They exploit without eating (zoos, skin, paying for others). Do not call them hypocrite from line one; reassert when they dodge. Deflection or non-answer = strike.

Difficulty:

evasive

Steps:

3

Flaws:

consumptionFraming, callingThemHypocrite, noReassertion, noStepThreeAnswer

Define veganism as ethical anti-exploitation principle, not diet. Do not ask 'go vegan' before this step.

Difficulty:

reachable

Steps:

4

Flaws:

prematureVeganAsk, objectifyingLanguage

Ask biggest advantage of living vegan. Justice for them; no longer hypocrite for you, not health or environment.

Difficulty:

reachable

Steps:

5

Flaws:

tangents, statistics, skippedAdvantage

Put them in the victim's position, not dog comparisons. Say your victims; use someone, not it.

Difficulty:

evasive

Steps:

6

Flaws:

dogComparison, objectifyingLanguage, victimsNotNamed, yourVictimsLanguage

Surface excuses, test each with victim-position. Reject research excuses and I don't know. Three strikes → disengage.

Difficulty:

evasive

Steps:

7

Flaws:

statistics, debating, wastingTime, researchExcuse

Zero or more victims because of you. Use will, how many more animals will be exploited.

Difficulty:

evasive

Steps:

8

Flaws:

pandering

Ask for vegan from now on. No maybe, no I'll try, no pandering. Do not celebrate, move to call to action.

Difficulty:

evasive

Steps:

9

Flaws:

pandering, prematureVeganAsk, maybeNotDeclaration, illTryNotDeclaration

After declaration: actively defend other animals, like we are doing. Passive veganism is not enough.

Difficulty:

reachable

Steps:

10

Flaws:

skippedCallToAction, foodForThought

Do not engage on merits. Includes plants, lions, protein science, semantics, Bible. Repeat your question.

Difficulty:

combative

Flaws:

debating

Simple binary questions. Never say 'good question' to derailers. Do not answer their questions about your diet.

Difficulty:

evasive

Flaws:

lostControl

One sharp question at a time. Target ~2 minutes for the full flowchart. Long talk implies complexity.

Difficulty:

reachable

Flaws:

overExplaining

Step 3 is exploitation vs respect, not eating, buying, or consumer choices. Exploitation includes zoos, skin, entertainment, paying for others.

Difficulty:

evasive

Steps:

3

Flaws:

consumptionFraming

Never label them a hypocrite from line one. Ask step 3 and let them conclude.

Difficulty:

combative

Steps:

3

Flaws:

callingThemHypocrite

Not cruelty, treatment, or reducing harm. Using someone for your purposes is the issue. When they raise roadkill or backyard eggs, do not debate. Reassert respect vs purposes.

Difficulty:

evasive

Steps:

1, 3

Flaws:

sufferingNotExploitation, howNotWhy

If you were in your victim's position, not 'what if this were a dog.'

Difficulty:

evasive

Steps:

6

Flaws:

dogComparison

Vegetarians are not allies. You are our target market, hold them to full anti-exploitation principle.

Difficulty:

evasive

Steps:

1, 4

Flaws:

vegetarianPass

Do not give them the answer. Ask step 3 until they acknowledge the contradiction themselves.

Difficulty:

combative

Steps:

3

Flaws:

givingTheAnswer, callingThemHypocrite

Not food for thought. No acceptable reason not to live vegan now. Move to declaration and activism.

Difficulty:

evasive

Steps:

8, 9, 10

Flaws:

foodForThought, pandering

No meat eater, omnivore, vegan journey, baby steps, or animal products. Animals are not products, say flesh, milk, eggs, skin.

Difficulty:

reachable

Steps:

1, 4

Flaws:

unacceptableLanguage, plantBasedNotVegan

Don't focus on symptoms, focus on root (exploitation). Never supply/demand or demanding language, because of you, your victims.

Difficulty:

evasive

Steps:

1

Flaws:

industryFocus, paymentLanguage, supplyAndDemand, demandingLanguage

No 'I don't mean to offend.' Confident delivery, you represent victims.

Difficulty:

combative

Steps:

1, 2

Flaws:

apologeticTone

Step 3 pattern: they dodge with not sure or a tangent (I have a dog), you must not ask the next question. Get clear yes or no first. (00463, 00472)

Difficulty:

evasive

Steps:

3

Flaws:

noStepThreeAnswer, consumptionFraming

No 'got a minute?' or 'want to talk about it?', ask the next question. (00471)

Difficulty:

reachable

Steps:

1, 2

Flaws:

askingPermission

Don't debate conditions, standard practices, or research on screen. (00304)

Difficulty:

evasive

Steps:

1, 7

Flaws:

welfareTrap, howNotWhy

No 'why do you think', A/B questions only. Rambling hands them control. (00467, 00322)

Difficulty:

evasive

Steps:

2, 4

Flaws:

openEndedRambling, useThinkLanguage, lostControl

How many animals SHOULD be exploited, zero or more? Connect zero to vegan now. (00479)

Difficulty:

evasive

Steps:

8

Flaws:

zeroOrMoreMustShould

No maybe, no I'll try, no celebration. Call to action, vegan from now on. (00308, 00464)

Difficulty:

evasive

Steps:

9

Flaws:

maybeNotDeclaration, illTryNotDeclaration, celebrateDeclaration, foodForThought

This mother is your victim, not this cow on screen. Personal accountability. (00305, 00320, 00456)

Difficulty:

evasive

Steps:

6, 8

Flaws:

yourVictimsLanguage, victimsNotNamed, objectifyingLanguage

Do you know the biggest advantage of living vegan? Justice and ending hypocrisy, not health. (00321, 00469)

Difficulty:

reachable

Steps:

5

Flaws:

skippedAdvantage, tangents

After declaration: do you agree we should actively defend other animals? (00321, 00325)

Difficulty:

reachable

Steps:

10

Flaws:

skippedCallToAction

You don't need days of research. If that objection weren't an issue, vegan now? (00460, 00466)

Difficulty:

evasive

Steps:

7, 9

Flaws:

researchExcuse, idontKnowAnswer

Engage everyone, especially the quiet one at declaration. Fake agreement is common. (00318, 00464)

Difficulty:

evasive

Steps:

9, 10

Flaws:

lostQuietPerson

Don't attach veganism to politics or other movements. Exploitation and respect stand alone. (00314)

Difficulty:

combative

Steps:

1, 4, 5

Flaws:

attachOtherCauses, debating

Use the deflection loop scenario: friendly non-vegan, won't answer feeling, talks in circles. Any deflection = strike. After three, walk away. Do not debate dodging or give extra chances.

Difficulty:

evasive

Steps:

7

Flaws:

failedToDisengage, wastingTime, debating, noReassertion

Always live vegan, never go, going, choosing, or give it a try/go.

Difficulty:

reachable

Steps:

4, 7, 9

Flaws:

liveNotGoVeganLanguage, illTryNotDeclaration

Most important step, get clear acknowledgment respect and exploitation cannot coexist before anything else.

Difficulty:

evasive

Steps:

3

Flaws:

noStepThreeAnswer, consumptionFraming, givingTheAnswer

Purposes framing only, not benefit, will, gain, pleasure, or interests. Never how we or ways we exploit. If you live vegan, contrast you vs I live vegan, not we. Each wrong frame gives escape routes.

Difficulty:

reachable

Steps:

1, 4

Flaws:

exploitationWrongDefinition, howWeWaysLanguage, consentFraming, includesSelfWithExploiters

Live free, not better treatment. No conditions, standard practices, or slaughterhouse focus.

Difficulty:

evasive

Steps:

1, 6

Flaws:

freedomNotTreatment, howNotWhy, welfareTrap

Do not frame as suffering, harm, or killing. When they raise roadkill, backyard eggs, or leftovers, do not adjudicate. Reassert: can you respect them if you use them for your purposes? Zero or more?

Difficulty:

evasive

Steps:

1, 3, 6, 8

Flaws:

sufferingNotExploitation, howNotWhy, welfareTrap

They say they are vegetarian or on your side. Do not validate, outreaching with full vigor.

Difficulty:

evasive

Steps:

1, 3, 4

Flaws:

vegetarianPass, consumptionFraming, pandering

Complete steps 1 to 3 with a reachable meat eater. Foundation before flexibility.

Difficulty:

reachable

Steps:

1, 2, 3

Flaws:

skippedStep, consumptionFraming

Do not accept welfare or humane farming as the issue. Stay on exploitation.

Difficulty:

evasive

Steps:

3, 4

Flaws:

howNotWhy, sufferingNotExploitation, consumptionFraming

Hold accountability without softening. Personal choice is not a defense.

Difficulty:

evasive

Steps:

2, 8

Flaws:

debating, pandering

If protein weren't a problem, would you go vegan now? No studies or nutrition lectures.

Difficulty:

evasive

Steps:

6, 7

Flaws:

tangents, statistics, debating

Do not debate plants or sentience. Repeat accountability questions.

Difficulty:

combative

Steps:

2, 3

Flaws:

debating, lostControl

Classic real-world trap: friendly, reasonable tone, won't answer feeling. Reframes exploitation, neutral ground, bigger picture. Practice judging continue vs disengage. Three deflections = walk away, not circles.

Difficulty:

evasive

Steps:

1, 7

Flaws:

failedToDisengage, wastingTime, debating, noReassertion

Three strikes, you're out. Plant the seed and disengage. Do not convince, debate, or chase politeness, test disengage after 3 objections.

Difficulty:

combative

Steps:

1, 7

Flaws:

wastingTime

They agree cruelty is bad, then defend roadkill, rescued hens, leftovers. Do not debate edge cases. Hold exploitation and declaration.

Difficulty:

evasive

Steps:

3, 6, 8

Flaws:

sufferingNotExploitation, howNotWhy, welfareTrap, consumptionFraming

Cover all 10 steps at evasive difficulty. Steps 1 to 3 are non-negotiable foundation.

Difficulty:

evasive

Steps:

1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10

Full flowchart under pressure. Maintain control, do not debate or pander.

Difficulty:

combative

Steps:

1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10